James, It would probably help to merge the patches first. It's sort of a "if you build it they will come" scenario. --Chad -----Original Message----- From: James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:42 AM To: Dupuis, Chad; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Setting target_can_queue from devinfo Well, given the way the conversation ended, I assume the patch was ok, and James just needs to be prodded to include it into scsi-misc-2.6. However, to make it useful, we need the entries for the different arrays to be posted as well. -- james s > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dupuis, Chad > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:23 PM > To: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Setting target_can_queue from devinfo > > Hi All, > > Was there ever any more work done on this patchset: > http://marc.info/?t=121070118300002&r=1&w=2? None of the kernel git > trees relating the scsi-misc seem to have this patchset applied. > > Thanks, > Chad > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
