On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 09:36 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 16:34 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=1 version=0x00 [no conformance
> > > claimed]
> >
> > We could try using this as the trigger. I assume all DIF supporting
> > devices must also claim conformance to SPC3/SBC2 or higher?
>
> Just to formalise it, that would be this patch. Hugh, could you try it?
Almost: I had to #include <scsi/scsi.h> to get SCSI_2 for the build
somewhere (and a SCSI_2 seems to be worth 1 more than anyone else's 2),
then it worked just fine for me thanks.
Hugh
p.s. sorry for losing an I from the "[SCSI]" Subject
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#include <scsi/scsi.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
struct request_queue;
@@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ static inline int scsi_device_enclosure(
static inline int scsi_device_protection(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
- return sdev->inquiry[5] & (1<<0);
+ return sdev->scsi_level > SCSI_2 && sdev->inquiry[5] & (1<<0);
}
#define MODULE_ALIAS_SCSI_DEVICE(type) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
