On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 09:36 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 16:34 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > PQual=0 Device_type=0 RMB=1 version=0x00 [no conformance
> > claimed]
>
> We could try using this as the trigger. I assume all DIF supporting
> devices must also claim conformance to SPC3/SBC2 or higher?
Just to formalise it, that would be this patch. Hugh, could you try it?
Thanks,
James
---
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index 291d56a..ffbc84a 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static inline int scsi_device_enclosure(struct scsi_device *sdev)
static inline int scsi_device_protection(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
- return sdev->inquiry[5] & (1<<0);
+ return sdev->scsi_level > SCSI_2 && sdev->inquiry[5] & (1<<0);
}
#define MODULE_ALIAS_SCSI_DEVICE(type) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
