>On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Love, Robert W <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> After a lot of planning and designing we've started to >> reorganize the Open-FCoE kernel code. > >Hello Robert, > >Sorry if I'm asking something trivial, but does this apply to the FCoE >initiator implementation or to the FCoE target implementation ? The focus is on the initiator, but it may have some impact on the target. My plan is to get the initiator an acceptable architecture and then see if we can fit the target in. If you're unaware, we have a target implementation that is based on a 2.6.23 tree on our website. Unfortunately, it's not getting any attention right now. Tomo also ported some of our code to userspace, but I believe that effort is relatively untested. So, after the initiator work is done, and time permitting, I'd like to revisit the target and see if we can either get the userspace port going or add some hooks into the initiator for an out-of-kernel target. If anyone has good ideas I'm all ears, we're just dedicated to the initiator for the time being. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
