On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Harald Arnesen wrote: > > I'll try applying the patch to a freshly downloaded git-tree. Ok, good. > Shall I try another compiler? I have at least these two: > > gcc version 3.4.6 (Ubuntu 3.4.6-6ubuntu2) > gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2) I would suggest a patch mis-application problem first (or possibly even the patch itself being broken - I simply didn't look very closely at the patch, but it *looked* ok). If it's a compiler bug, it's a pretty big one, and quite frankly, I doubt it. Compiler bugs do happen, but they are pretty rare, and they tend to have more subtle effects than the one you see. However: > in addition to the self-compiled 4.2.3 I used for the tests. 4.2.3? Really? That's pretty damn recent, and so almost totally untested. That does make a compiler bug at least more likely. So yes, if you already have other compilers installed, you should try them. If it really is a compiler bug, it's a really bad one, and you would want to let the gcc people know. Still, I'd double-check that the asc_dvc_varp->overrun_buf = kzalloc(ASC_OVERRUN_BSIZE, GFP_KERNEL); line was added properly first. You should see it way after the point where it did asc_dvc_varp = &boardp->dvc_var.asc_dvc_var; to initialize it (and both statements should be inside a if (ASC_NARROW_BOARD(boardp)) { conditional - please check that the source code looks sane too). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html