Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional

To: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx" <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:30:13 -0700
Cc: "quic_mnaresh@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_mnaresh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx" <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>, "beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx" <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "avri.altman@xxxxxxx" <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, "cw9316.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cw9316.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Powen Kao (高伯文) <Powen.Kao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "minwoo.im@xxxxxxxxxxx" <minwoo.im@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx" <quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <016a1877dcd96b5a81a52d253cc6c9132e8d113f.camel@mediatek.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 6/24/24 1:39 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:

On Sun, 2024-06-23 at 19:03 +0530, manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx

Perhaps we should use different masks?


Yes, it is better use different mask with different mode.

I will introduce different masks for the SDB and MCQ modes.

Thanks,

Bart.

References:
- [PATCH 0/8] UFS patches for kernel 6.11
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: Peter Wang (王信友)
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufs: Make .get_hba_mac() optional
  - From: Peter Wang (王信友)