Hi Bart, > From: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > UFS devices perform better when using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command > instead of the FUA flag. Hence this patch. If you have, could you share the result when using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command? Thanks, Daejun > > Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > [ bvanassche: modified a source code comment ] > --- > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > index bf3cb12ef02f..461aa51cfccc 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > @@ -5056,6 +5056,9 @@ static int ufshcd_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev) > /* WRITE_SAME command is not supported */ > sdev->no_write_same = 1; > > + /* Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA to improve performance */ > + sdev->sdev_bflags = BLIST_BROKEN_FUA; > + > ufshcd_lu_init(hba, sdev); > > ufshcd_setup_links(hba, sdev); >
