[PATCH 0/2] Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA for UFS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Martin,

Apparently UFS devices perform better when using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of
FUA. Hence this patch series that makes the SCSI core submit a SYNCHRONIZE
CACHE command instead of setting the FUA bit for UFS devices. Please consider
this patch series for the next merge window.

Thanks,

Bart.

Asutosh Das (1):
  scsi: ufs: Use SYNCHRONIZE CACHE instead of FUA

Bart Van Assche (1):
  scsi: core: Introduce the BLIST_BROKEN_FUA flag

 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c    | 3 +++
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c   | 3 +++
 include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux