On 11/22/22 08:13, Mike Christie wrote:
On 11/22/22 12:38 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 09:39:25PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
+ result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdev, cmd, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, buffer,
+ request_len, 30 * HZ, 3,
+ ((struct scsi_exec_args) { .sshdr = &sshdr }));
Maybe it's me, but I hate the syntax to declare structs inside argument
I'll change it to setup the scsi_exec_args struct like normal. I've got this
comment several times now.
With the current design we know all the args when we declare the variables so
I can do it then like normal.
Will struct scsi_exec_args be retained? I'm asking this because I'd like
to add another argument to the (already too large) argument list of
scsi_execute().
Thanks,
Bart.
