Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Use 'else' in ufshcd_hba_enable()

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 10/26/22 23:20, Keoseong Park wrote:
> Convert if (!ret) { ... } if (ret) { ... } into
> if (!ret) { ... } else { ... }.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 7256e6c43ca6..3b794be53287 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
>   			if (!ret)
>   				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
> -			if (ret)
> +			else
>   				dev_err(hba->dev,
>   					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
>   		}

If ufshcd_hba_enable() is modified it should be converted into the widely
used "if error return" style. How about the untested patch below?

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 05feec10fad3..89f8b86c3f85 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -4668,14 +4668,16 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 		/* enable UIC related interrupts */
 		ufshcd_enable_intr(hba, UFSHCD_UIC_MASK);
 		ret = ufshcd_dme_reset(hba);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
-			if (!ret)
-				ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
-			if (ret)
-				dev_err(hba->dev,
-					"Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n");
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(hba->dev, "DME_RESET failed\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+		ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(hba->dev, "Enabling DME failed\n");
+			return ret;
 		}
+		ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE);
 	} else {
 		ret = ufshcd_hba_execute_hce(hba);
 	}