Hi Bart, >On 10/26/22 23:20, Keoseong Park wrote: >> Convert if (!ret) { ... } if (ret) { ... } into >> if (!ret) { ... } else { ... }. >> >> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park <keosung.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >> index 7256e6c43ca6..3b794be53287 100644 >> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >> @@ -4670,7 +4670,7 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba) >> ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba); >> if (!ret) >> ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE); >> - if (ret) >> + else >> dev_err(hba->dev, >> "Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n"); >> } > >If ufshcd_hba_enable() is modified it should be converted into the widely >used "if error return" style. How about the untested patch below? Thanks for your feedback. That seems to be better. I will apply it to the next version. Best Regards, Keoseong > >diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >index 05feec10fad3..89f8b86c3f85 100644 >--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c >@@ -4668,14 +4668,16 @@ int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba) > /* enable UIC related interrupts */ > ufshcd_enable_intr(hba, UFSHCD_UIC_MASK); > ret = ufshcd_dme_reset(hba); >- if (!ret) { >- ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba); >- if (!ret) >- ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE); >- if (ret) >- dev_err(hba->dev, >- "Host controller enable failed with non-hce\n"); >+ if (ret) { >+ dev_err(hba->dev, "DME_RESET failed\n"); >+ return ret; >+ } >+ ret = ufshcd_dme_enable(hba); >+ if (ret) { >+ dev_err(hba->dev, "Enabling DME failed\n"); >+ return ret; > } >+ ufshcd_vops_hce_enable_notify(hba, POST_CHANGE); > } else { > ret = ufshcd_hba_execute_hce(hba); > }