Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: ufs: Try harder to change the power mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/2/22 23:10, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 30/09/22 01:00, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Instead of only retrying the START STOP UNIT command if a unit attention
is reported, repeat it if any SCSI error is reported by the device or if
the command timed out.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 02e73208b921..e8c0504e9e83 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -8784,9 +8784,9 @@ static int ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
  	for (retries = 3; retries > 0; --retries) {
  		ret = scsi_execute(sdp, cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0, NULL, &sshdr,
  				START_STOP_TIMEOUT, 0, 0, RQF_PM, NULL);
-		if (!scsi_status_is_check_condition(ret) ||
-				!scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr) ||
-				sshdr.sense_key != UNIT_ATTENTION)
+		if (ret < 0)
+			break;

Could use a comment to answer: why not retry if ret < 0 ?

OK, I will add a comment above that if-test.

+		if (host_byte(ret) == 0 && scsi_status_is_good(ret))
  			break;

Also could use a comment: why not just "if (!ret)" ?

The UFS spec says "CONDITION MET - Not used for UFS" so changing the above test into "if (!ret)" would be valid. If nobody objects I will change the above test into "if (ret == 0)" instead of adding a comment.

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux