Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] scsi: ufs: Try harder to change the power mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/09/22 01:00, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Instead of only retrying the START STOP UNIT command if a unit attention
> is reported, repeat it if any SCSI error is reported by the device or if
> the command timed out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 02e73208b921..e8c0504e9e83 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8784,9 +8784,9 @@ static int ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>  	for (retries = 3; retries > 0; --retries) {
>  		ret = scsi_execute(sdp, cmd, DMA_NONE, NULL, 0, NULL, &sshdr,
>  				START_STOP_TIMEOUT, 0, 0, RQF_PM, NULL);
> -		if (!scsi_status_is_check_condition(ret) ||
> -				!scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr) ||
> -				sshdr.sense_key != UNIT_ATTENTION)
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			break;

Could use a comment to answer: why not retry if ret < 0 ?

> +		if (host_byte(ret) == 0 && scsi_status_is_good(ret))
>  			break;

Also could use a comment: why not just "if (!ret)" ?

>  	}
>  	if (ret) {




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux