Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further

To: Peter Wang <peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:08:23 -0800
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Santosh Yaraganavi <santoshsy@xxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Vishak G <vishak.g@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1a196e1b-1412-90f3-e511-3f669572a619@mediatek.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0

On 11/16/21 1:07 AM, Peter Wang wrote:

Should we add unmap?


Hi Peter,

I will add DMA unmapping code in the abort handler.

Thanks,

Bart.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further
  - From: Adrian Hunter

References:
- [PATCH 00/11] UFS patches for kernel v5.17
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further
  - From: Peter Wang