Re: [PATCH 08/11] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling further

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/11/21 5:17 PM, Peter Wang wrote:
Hi Bart,

On 11/10/21 8:44 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Make sure that aborted commands are completed once by clearing the
corresponding tag bit from hba->outstanding_reqs. This patch is a
follow-up for commit cd892096c940 ("scsi: ufs: core: Improve SCSI
abort handling").

Fixes: 7a3e97b0dc4b ("[SCSI] ufshcd: UFS Host controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 8f5640647054..1e15ed1f639f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -7090,6 +7090,15 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
          goto release;
      }
  +    /*
+     * ufshcd_try_to_abort_task() cleared the 'tag' bit in the doorbell
+     * register. Clear the corresponding bit from outstanding_reqs to
+     * prevent early completion.
+     */
+    spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+    __clear_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
+    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
+

should we also call unmap?

    scsi_dma_unmap(cmd);

Hi Bart,

Should we add unmap?


Thanks.

Peter



      lrbp->cmd = NULL;
      err = SUCCESS;




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux