> > > > > This patch is not really needed - just squash it to the previous > one. > > > > Why you said this patch is not really needed? > > > > I don't understand > > > > Our WB device need to disable WB when called > > > > ufshcd_reset_and_restore() func. > > > > Please explain reason. > > > This patch only change the names of some functions defined in the > > > first patch. > > > Squash it to the first one. > > > > "Asutosh Das (asd) <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" said this function not > > clearly. > > So I modify this function name. > > I think this name is clear than the previous name. > I am not arguing about that. > Are you familiar with the concept of squash? Sorry, I misunderstand. I do not know very well. Please can you explain concept of squash to me?
