> > > > > > This patch is not really needed - just squash it to the previous one. > > Why you said this patch is not really needed? > > I don't understand > > Our WB device need to disable WB when called > > ufshcd_reset_and_restore() func. > > Please explain reason. > This patch only change the names of some functions defined in the first > patch. > Squash it to the first one. "Asutosh Das (asd) <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" said this function not clearly. So I modify this function name. I think this name is clear than the previous name.
