> > > > This patch is not really needed - just squash it to the previous one. > > > Why you said this patch is not really needed? > > > I don't understand > > > Our WB device need to disable WB when called > > > ufshcd_reset_and_restore() func. > > > Please explain reason. > > This patch only change the names of some functions defined in the first > > patch. > > Squash it to the first one. > > "Asutosh Das (asd) <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" said this function not > clearly. > So I modify this function name. > I think this name is clear than the previous name. I am not arguing about that. Are you familiar with the concept of squash?
