On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 19:57 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > Good start! Just one comment before I look over this and merge it - > I'd > prefer keeping this out of sg.c. One of the problems we have right now > are dual pieces of code for sg v3, and I think it would be silly to > continue down this path. Lets keep sg.c as a legacy sg v3 interface > (it'll be the only one except SG_IO in the block layer), and let bsg > take sg v4 and forward. > > There's really zero gain in having it in two places. There is a slight complexity here in that sg is the only thing that attaches to things like processor devices, or other devices we have no ULD for; so if we want sg v4 exposed to them, we need to at least route sg though this ioctl. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
