Hi, Bart
> > Add one new parameter max_lu_supported in struct ufs_dev_info, which
> > will be used to express exactly how many general LUs being supported
> > by UFS device.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index
> > fcc9b4d4e56f..c982bcc94662 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> > @@ -530,6 +530,8 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
> > bool f_power_on_wp_en;
> > /* Keeps information if any of the LU is power on write protected */
> > bool is_lu_power_on_wp;
> > + /* Maximum number of general LU supported by the UFS device */
> > + u8 max_lu_supported;
> > u16 wmanufacturerid;
> > /*UFS device Product Name */
> > u8 *model;
>
> There is a strong tradition in the Linux kernel community of introducing structure
> members in the same patch that introduces the first user of such a structure
> member. I think patch 8/9 is the first patch that uses this structure member.
> Please consider combining patches 7/9 and 8/9 into a single patch.
>
Thanks, I split it in order to review easilier. I will combine these two into a single one in the next version.
//Bean
