On 2020-01-16 13:59, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add one new parameter max_lu_supported in struct ufs_dev_info,
> which will be used to express exactly how many general LUs being
> supported by UFS device.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> index fcc9b4d4e56f..c982bcc94662 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -530,6 +530,8 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
> bool f_power_on_wp_en;
> /* Keeps information if any of the LU is power on write protected */
> bool is_lu_power_on_wp;
> + /* Maximum number of general LU supported by the UFS device */
> + u8 max_lu_supported;
> u16 wmanufacturerid;
> /*UFS device Product Name */
> u8 *model;
There is a strong tradition in the Linux kernel community of introducing
structure members in the same patch that introduces the first user of
such a structure member. I think patch 8/9 is the first patch that uses
this structure member. Please consider combining patches 7/9 and 8/9
into a single patch.
Thanks,
Bart.
