Re: Latest versions of rtslib, configshell and targetcli

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Allright.  Gave the -fb versions a try.

790037 -rw-r--r--.   1 root root 18100 Dec 14 23:22 scsi_target.lio
786433 drwxr-xr-x. 155 root root 12288 Dec 14 23:52 ..
787390 -rw-------.   1 root root    71 Dec 15 01:43 saveconfig.json

They use json instead of the old .lio format for storing the config. And so won't let me restore my old config:


/> restoreconfig /etc/target/scsi_target.lio
Error parsing savefile: /etc/target/scsi_target.lio
/>


The -fb version however supports the force_pr_aptpl option:

config# load /etc/target/scsi_target.lio
Replace the current configuration with /etc/target/scsi_target.lio? [y/N] y

*** Unknown attribute: storage fileio disk mdsesxip01-d01.img attribute force_pr_aptpl
config#

[root@nexus01 target]# grep -EiR force_pr_aptpl *

targetcli-fb/build/targetcli-fb-2.1.51.2.g94d971d/targetcli/ui_backstore.py: 'force_pr_aptpl': ('number', 'If set to 1, force SPC-3 PR Activate Persistence across Target Power Loss operation.'), targetcli-fb/targetcli/ui_backstore.py: 'force_pr_aptpl': ('number', 'If set to 1, force SPC-3 PR Activate Persistence across Target Power Loss operation.'),

So just want to bring up the question once more: which version of targetcli, rtslib and configshell did folks here find most compatible? Still the -fb version?

Thx,
TK

On 4/7/2019 12:30 AM, TomK wrote:
On 3/28/2019 1:53 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On March 28, 2019 5:42:52 PM UTC, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:26:13PM -0400, TomK wrote:

        Hey All,

        I'm wondering if there are newer versions of the following
        packages still
        available and where I could download them from? The github link
        hasn't
        been updated in quite some time:


    I think you want to look for the versions with the -fb postfix.  They
    aren't 100% compatible, but a lot more actively maintained.

    I've Cced the mailing list for the project, although I haven't gotten
    a single mail from that list for more than a year either..
------------------------------------------------------------------------     targetcli-fb-devel mailing list -- targetcli-fb-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx     To unsubscribe send an email to targetcli-fb-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Fedora Code of Conduct:https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
    List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines     List Archives:https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/targetcli-fb-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I have been using the -fb versions for a while now and not had any issues with them. You do need to use either the -fb versions for all, or the non-fb versions for all. Mix and match is not supported and can lead to strange results (if it even works).

I also don't remember getting any emails on this list for a while either.

--
Joost
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Thanks all!

If targetcli or the -fb version isn't maintained much anymore, I'm wondering what else I could use in it's place?



--
Thx,
TK.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux