On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 13:36 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 11/7/19 1:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 11/7/19 8:49 AM, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > Avoid an uninitialized value being falsely treated as NVMe > > > priority. > > > > Although this patch looks fine to me: which uninitialized value are > > you > > referring to and how does this patch make a difference? > > Does your comment refer to ha->fc4_type_priority ? You may want to > mention this in the commit message since that variable does not occur > in > the code touched by this patch. Right. Thanks for pointing that out.
