Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@xxxxxxxx>, Himanshu Madhani <hmadhani@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Hernandez <mhernandez@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:26:50 -0800
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191107164848.31837-2-martin.wilck@suse.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 11/7/19 8:49 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:

Avoid an uninitialized value being falsely treated as NVMe priority.

Although this patch looks fine to me: which uninitialized value are youreferring to and how does this patch make a difference?


Thanks,

Bart.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME
  - From: Bart Van Assche

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] scsi: qla2xxx: initialize fc4_type_priority
  - From: Martin Wilck
- [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME
  - From: Martin Wilck

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: qla2xxx: initialize fc4_type_priority
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: qla2xxx: initialize fc4_type_priority
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux