Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: qla2xxx: don't use zero for FC4_PRIORITY_NVME

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 11/7/19 1:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/7/19 8:49 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Avoid an uninitialized value being falsely treated as NVMe priority.
>
> Although this patch looks fine to me: which uninitialized value are you 
> referring to and how does this patch make a difference?

Does your comment refer to ha->fc4_type_priority ? You may want to 
mention this in the commit message since that variable does not occur in 
the code touched by this patch.

Thanks,

Bart.