Re: Request for opinion: ufsutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2/13/2019 9:30 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
>>
>> I can see the issue, there is no straightforward way of having "ufs-bsg"
>> without
>> a device attached?
> Right.
> 
>>
>> This or any other method of talking with UniPro and MPhy layers when there
>> is no
>> device are necessary for us. Do you see some good way of doing this?
> I don't really know.
> If you have access to the bootloader, then implement it there, 
> And call this functionality via fastboot getvar or fastboot oem.
For us would be better if we manage to use it through the driver.

Until now, from this thread I think there are two scenarios:

When there's a device, through ufs-bsg:
 - ufs-utils: using the current ufs_bsg interface will have the capability to
cover most of the scenarios that I can think of and will be the standard way to
interact with the ufs driver.

During bring up/debug without link to device:

- My proposal is to create a debugFS interface:
   uic-cmd/
   ├── dme-get
   ├── dme-set
   ├── dme-enable
   ├── dme-reset
   └── ...
   test-feature/
   ├── PA_tf
   └── ...
   error-dump/
   ├── UECPA
   ├── UECDL
   └── ...
   ...

I kindly request the ecosystem feedback.

Thanks,
Pedro





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux