Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Introduce the bidi_supported flag in the host template structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 22:06 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
+AD4 +AD4 It would help if you could explain why you are so strongly opposed
+AD4 +AD4 against keeping BIDI support in the kernel.
+AD4 
+AD4 My preference is to remove it because there is simply no good use case
+AD4 for it.
+AD4 
+AD4 The fact that this peculiar command was once defined and has since been
+AD4 obsoleted doesn't imply we should go out of our ways to support it.
+AD4 There's all sorts of other cruft defined by T10 that nobody uses and
+AD4 never will.

Hi Martin,

Removing bidi support will break bidi drivers. Does this mean that the osd
driver should be removed before bidi support is removed from the SCSI core?

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux