Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Introduce the bidi_supported flag in the host template structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 09:35 +-0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+AD4 I disagree with investing further effort into BIDI support.  It is
+AD4 dead for all practical purposes in standards and implementation,
+AD4 and the fact that we found all these bugs in it just further confirms
+AD4 that.  The only answer to that is to bite the bullet and remove it.

Hi Christoph,

It would help if you could explain why you are so strongly opposed against
keeping BIDI support in the kernel. If the reason is that removing BIDI
support would allow to improve NVMe processing performance in the kernel
by a small margin, that is not good enough as a reason. Users who care
about that level of performance will access the NVMe queues directly from
user space anyway to avoid the system call overhead.

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux