Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Introduce the bidi_supported flag in the host template structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bart,

> It would help if you could explain why you are so strongly opposed
> against keeping BIDI support in the kernel.

My preference is to remove it because there is simply no good use case
for it.

The fact that this peculiar command was once defined and has since been
obsoleted doesn't imply we should go out of our ways to support it.
There's all sorts of other cruft defined by T10 that nobody uses and
never will.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux