Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] esp_scsi: Grant disconnect privilege for untagged commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Finn Thain wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > > +	*p++ = IDENTIFY(lp && (tp->flags & ESP_TGT_DISCONNECT), lun);
> > 
> > I think lp should always be non-NULL here.
> > 
> 
> It's not clear from Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt, but I guess 
> that's true for scanning of targets.
> 
> Is it true in general that queuecommand for a device will not occur 
> before its slave_alloc and not after its slave_destroy invocation?
> 
> (I'm thinking of queuecommand via the other command submission paths, 
> like ioctl.)
> 

Nevermind. From a closer reading of the Documentation, I see that it is 
true in general.

-- 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux