RE: [PATCH] mptspi : min_period,max_offset,max_width,incorrectlyset, resulting domain validation failing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:32 -0600, Moore, Eric wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:00 AM, James Bottomley wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > Heh, Quantum Atlas ... I should have known ...
> > 
> > OK, try the attached (it's a rollup of all the heuristics 
> > changes we've
> > been discussing).
> > 
> 
> Thanks so much
> That appears to fix both issues I reported on U160 and U80 drives.
> Can you pls apply this to your tree for 2.6.19 push. 

Yes ... but I need to get back home to sort out my tree and the pending
patch pile first.

> > Actually, there are: there are some fujitsu devices that do 
> > QAS at u160.
> 
> Didn't know.  Can you verify that it works with fusion with QAS enabled?

I don't have one ... I actually only have 2 u80 (Quantum Atlas) and
2xu320 (Seagate Cheetah) SPI devices.

I know there's a problem because I enabled QAS in the aic7xxx (u160)
driver and it failed miserably on a Fujitsu when the drive tried to
negotiate for it.  I believe Matthew Wilcox was going to get one to try
out QAS and IU on the 53c1010.

> > This is a user policy thing.  Usually you want QAS set where 
> > possible to
> > speed up the transport ... if you're getting starvation problems, you
> > can disable it using the parameters.
> > 
> 
> I just don't think that is a good idea.
> I forsee support calls, for users that don't know they
> can't run QAS in mixed mode, and don't know this work around
> that your suggesting.   Its going happen.  
> I still think back to Andrew Patterson's request that we 
> have a mechnism to turn one knob to shut off QAS for entire host, 
> instead of traversing each and every target.

It's hard to come up with an actual user scenario where fairness would
be an issue.  Most users won't mix QAS and non-QAS disk devices, except
for limited periods where they're upgrading or something ... I suppose
there could be an issue with a tape drive on the same bus, but usually
people are canny enough not to mix disk and tape either.

There's really only one known field issue where QAS was a suspect ...
and no-one's been able to reproduce it.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux