Moore, Eric wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2006 1:56 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
A pretty print for the current u32 would be very useful though for
transports dealing with non single level luns (or address
methods other
than zero).
A better subject line would have been "HCIL isolation" I suppose. I
would like to see increased usage of the accessors already present in
include/scsi/scsi_device.h, which would ease the transition from
hardcoded HCIL struct members to a more flexible addressing method.
Though, FWIW, for LUNs I would certainly like to see u64 rather than
u32.....
shouldn't luns be defined as:
u8 lun[8] instead of u64?
Please, not that argument again :)
It's purely semantics, the same storage is used, and only very rarely
are the contents actually examined in either case.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html