On Monday, September 11, 2006 1:56 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > A pretty print for the current u32 would be very useful though for > > transports dealing with non single level luns (or address > methods other > > than zero). > > A better subject line would have been "HCIL isolation" I suppose. I > would like to see increased usage of the accessors already present in > include/scsi/scsi_device.h, which would ease the transition from > hardcoded HCIL struct members to a more flexible addressing method. > > Though, FWIW, for LUNs I would certainly like to see u64 rather than > u32..... > shouldn't luns be defined as: u8 lun[8] instead of u64? Luben? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
