Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:32:02 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:24:42AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Hello
Just would like to ask if you want patches for:
Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't
get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged.
I was kinda planning on merging it ;)
I can't say that I'm in love with the patches, but they do improve the
situation.
At present we have >50 different definitions of TRUE and gawd knows how
many private implementations of various flavours of bool.
In that context, Richard's approach of giving the kernel a single
implementation of bool/true/false and then converting things over to use it
makes sense. The other approach would be to go through and nuke the lot,
convert them to open-coded 0/1.
Well... we are programming in C here, aren't we ;)
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
