On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:32:02 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:24:42AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote: > > Hello > > > > Just would like to ask if you want patches for: > > Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't > get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged. I was kinda planning on merging it ;) I can't say that I'm in love with the patches, but they do improve the situation. At present we have >50 different definitions of TRUE and gawd knows how many private implementations of various flavours of bool. In that context, Richard's approach of giving the kernel a single implementation of bool/true/false and then converting things over to use it makes sense. The other approach would be to go through and nuke the lot, convert them to open-coded 0/1. I'm not particularly fussed either way, really. But the present situation is nuts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
