On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:25:56AM -0800, James Smart wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to improve the 32Bit writeq() code?
>
> Well, now that I'm asking for specific details internally, I'm finding that
> no one can find the failing machine any more.
>
> I'm going to keep looking (and testing) for another day or two, and if
> nothing pops up, will repost removing the 64bit define.
Thanks :-)
> Yes - I know. On the WC issue though, given how tightly bound the behavior
> is with the platform as well as whether it provides a real benefit vs a
> simple "it works", I don't believe this is one that I want to be "generic"
> on.
Hmmm OK, but this won't make out ARM and PPC teams very happy.
Well let's see,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
