>> Just would like to ask if you want patches for: > >Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't >get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged. > >> * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone) >> Fixing boolean checking, ex: >> if (bool == FALSE) >> to >> if (!bool) > >this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing >any boolean type. Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting >all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be >very welcome janitorial work. I don't get it. You object to the 'idiocy' (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/27/281), but find the x==FALSE -> !x a good thing? Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
