Re: support ranges TRIM for libata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:43:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I tried this earlier before giving up on it because it looked to ugly.
> But I can complete that version of it and post it for people to compare.

Meh, I remember why I gave up on it - to support queued trim passthrough
we'd need to implement ATA 32 for the auxiliary fields and thus support
32-bit CDBs.  I don't really want to go there..



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux