On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch is wrong. The purpose of the dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ check > is to avoid that the expression 1UL * dev_loss_tmo * HZ further down > overflows. Can you check whether changing the if-statement into if (1UL * > dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ) also suppresses the compiler warning? Hi Bart, Right, now a I see... Doing your proposed change the warning go away... Do you want me to send a new patch for that? -- Augusto Mecking Caringi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html