On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:06 +0000, Augusto Mecking Caringi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Bart Van Assche > <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch is wrong. The purpose of the dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ check > > is to avoid that the expression 1UL * dev_loss_tmo * HZ further down > > overflows. Can you check whether changing the if-statement into if (1UL * > > dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ) also suppresses the compiler warning? > > Hi Bart, > > Right, now a I see... > > Doing your proposed change the warning go away... > > Do you want me to send a new patch for that? Hello Augusto, If you want your patch to go upstream you will have to repost it. Bart.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
