> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 7:12 AM > To: Cathy Avery <cavery@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Haiyang Zhang > <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Provide a lightweight option > for Virtual FC Hosts. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:28:57PM -0500, Cathy Avery wrote: > > The patch provides a means to offer a lightweight option to the > > current FC transport class. The new option is selected by a > > driver when it indicates it wants the lightweight > > transport via fc_function_template. > > This need some really good documentation in the code and changelog > what "lightweight" means. It's a pretty horrible term, btw. This was a concept that James proposed almost a year ago. I agree, we need to document this better. K. Y -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
