Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:07:19AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Yes, but in scsi_priv.h, please ... I can actually think of another use
for it in terms of getting the SG reset handler to work properly.
Okay, will do in scsi_priv.h
Things used by the transport classes traditionally weren't in scsi_priv.h,
that was for scsi_mod internals only. Should we changed that? I'd rather
have another header for semi-volatile APIs transport classes use.
Hence my objection... Transport classes also aren't SCSI-specific.
Jeff
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
