On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:07:19AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Yes, but in scsi_priv.h, please ... I can actually think of another use > > for it in terms of getting the SG reset handler to work properly. > > Okay, will do in scsi_priv.h Things used by the transport classes traditionally weren't in scsi_priv.h, that was for scsi_mod internals only. Should we changed that? I'd rather have another header for semi-volatile APIs transport classes use. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
