On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:46:56PM -0500, Willem Riede wrote: > On 02/07/2006 04:12:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:02:21PM -0500, Willem Riede wrote: > > > > > But I will certainly help retire scsi_request. And anything else that is > > > needed to keep up with proper kernel style. Let me know what those are, if > > > you would? I'll start looking at how st has changed, and will be back with > > > any questions I may have. > > > > right now the above is the most urgent bit. What would be nice but not > > required is a conversion to the sense handling helpers, similar to what > > st got (aka using the *normalize_sense functions and then dealing with the > > parsed sense buffer instead of the raw sense data) > > Ok, so here is my first take at satisfying this request. > Be warned, that beyond compiling, and checking that the new module > doesn't immediately blow up, there hasn't yet been a lot of testing. > > But this should allow you to comment on the changes, and move forward > with dropping scsi_request from the kernel code. > > Signed-off-by: Willem Riede <osst@xxxxxxxxx> James, could you put this into the scsi-misc tree so we don't have any ULD using the scsi_request APIs anymore? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
