Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Brian King wrote: > > I was afraid that might happen. Okay, forget the patch. > > > > How come you didn't mention the ipr driver before when I first raised the > > possibility of making this change? > > Sorry about that... I wanted to verify on my end that the scsi level getting > returned was 0 before doing so. Your repost was a reminder... Maybe there's a way around this. Would it be okay to add a flag to the target structure, to indicate that PDT = 0x1f should be interpreted as "No LUN present"? Alan Stern
I have this same problem for netapp targets (different scsi_level) and have been meaning to submit a patch so I'm interested in any patch you might have. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
