Re: [PATCH] Recognize missing LUNs for non-standard devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, David Wysochanski wrote:

> > Maybe there's a way around this.  Would it be okay to add a flag to the
> > target structure, to indicate that PDT = 0x1f should be interpreted as "No
> > LUN present"?
> > 
> > Alan Stern
> > 
> 
> I have this same problem for netapp targets (different scsi_level)
> and have been meaning to submit a patch so I'm interested in any
> patch you might have.

Okay, when I write it I'll let you know.  But first I would like to add a
bflags field to the scsi_target and fix up the flags in scsi_device.

Alan Stern

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux