Re: [PATCH] Recognize missing LUNs for non-standard devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Brian King wrote:

> > I was afraid that might happen.  Okay, forget the patch.
> > 
> > How come you didn't mention the ipr driver before when I first raised the 
> > possibility of making this change?
> 
> Sorry about that... I wanted to verify on my end that the scsi level getting
> returned was 0 before doing so. Your repost was a reminder...

Maybe there's a way around this.  Would it be okay to add a flag to the 
target structure, to indicate that PDT = 0x1f should be interpreted as "No 
LUN present"?

Alan Stern

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux