Luben Tuikov wrote:
As opposed to those vendors saying: We _really_ need 64 bit LUNS
and it would be really nice to get rid of HCIL, etc, etc.
Everybody agrees with this 100%
Note that James submitted a sdev_printk() patch in the past few days,
which assists in removing HCIL from the SCSI core.
IMO, 64 bit LUNs and no HCIL is more important than "transport
attributes" and should've _preceded_ them.
Agreed. But that's a lot of work, and I doubt people want to delay SAS
further to wait for complete HCIL elimination.
The fact that you're trying to umbrella them together, doesn't
make it _technologically_ correct.
It's muddled together, yes. That doesn't make it any less correct.
It's just not a clean, immediate separation. Its a separation that
takes time.
Jeff
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
