On Mon, Jun 20 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > @@ -2098,14 +2098,14 @@ > > > * Data will be mapped directly for zero copy io, if possible. Otherwise > > > * a kernel bounce buffer is used. > > > * > > > - * A matching blk_rq_unmap_user() must be issued at the end of io, while > > > - * still in process context. > > > + * A matching blk_rq_unmap_user_iov() must be issued at the end of io, > > > + * while still in process context. > > > > ? > > This is ontop of my patch to remove the non-iov variant. Hmm, the function names still looked like the older ones. > > > @@ -2221,9 +2220,10 @@ > > > /** > > > * blk_rq_map_kern - map kernel data to a request, for REQ_BLOCK_PC usage > > > * @q: request queue where request should be inserted > > > - * @rw: READ or WRITE data > > > + * @rw: request to fill > > > > @rq > > > > Rest looks good, care to rediff it? > > Yeah, will do so later. Thanks! -- Jens Axboe - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
