On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > @@ -2098,14 +2098,14 @@ > > * Data will be mapped directly for zero copy io, if possible. Otherwise > > * a kernel bounce buffer is used. > > * > > - * A matching blk_rq_unmap_user() must be issued at the end of io, while > > - * still in process context. > > + * A matching blk_rq_unmap_user_iov() must be issued at the end of io, > > + * while still in process context. > > ? This is ontop of my patch to remove the non-iov variant. > > @@ -2221,9 +2220,10 @@ > > /** > > * blk_rq_map_kern - map kernel data to a request, for REQ_BLOCK_PC usage > > * @q: request queue where request should be inserted > > - * @rw: READ or WRITE data > > + * @rw: request to fill > > @rq > > Rest looks good, care to rediff it? Yeah, will do so later. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
